Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2017 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (4) TMI 1495 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance under Section 35(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Disallowance under Section 35(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961:

The assessee, a partnership firm engaged in share trading, filed its return of income and claimed a weighted deduction for a donation made to M/s. Herbicure Healthcare Bio-Herbal Research Foundation. The donation was initially approved under Section 35(1)(ii) of the Act. However, during scrutiny, it was revealed through a sworn statement by the Founder Director of M/s. Herbicure that donations were accepted and then returned to the donors after deducting a commission. Consequently, the Assessing Officer disallowed the deduction claimed by the assessee.

The Tribunal examined whether the withdrawal of approval under Section 35(1)(ii) applied retrospectively. It was noted that at the time of the donation, M/s. Herbicure was an approved institution. The Tribunal referred to the Hon’ble Bombay High Court's decision in Seksaria Biswan Sugar Factory, which established that retrospective cancellation of approval does not affect the deduction claimed if the institution was approved at the time of donation. Therefore, the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer was not sustained.

However, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to ascertain whether the donation was returned to the assessee after deducting a commission, as alleged. The case was remitted back for fresh consideration with instructions to provide the assessee sufficient opportunities for hearing.

2. Disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961:

The Assessing Officer disallowed expenses incurred towards earning exempt income under Section 14A, amounting to ?2,89,666, which exceeded the dividend income of ?1,78,833 earned by the assessee. The Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer did not provide a basis for the disallowance and failed to consider the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Rules.

The Tribunal referred to the Hon’ble Delhi High Court's decision in Joint Investments Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT, which held that disallowance under Section 14A cannot exceed the exempt income earned. Additionally, the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in United Breweries Ltd. v. DCIT emphasized the necessity for the Assessing Officer to ascertain the use of interest-bearing borrowings for making investments.

Following these precedents, the Tribunal remitted the issue back to the Assessing Officer to determine the extent of interest-bearing borrowings used for investments in shares and mutual funds, directing a fresh consideration of the disallowance under Section 14A read with Rule 8D.

Conclusion:

The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes, with the Tribunal remitting both issues back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration and appropriate action based on the detailed observations and directions provided.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates