9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Appeal against demand of Service Tax, waiver of pre-deposit, nature of service received, interpretation of "Scientific or Technical Consultancy".
Analysis: 1. The appeal was filed against the demand of Service Tax imposed on the appellants for a service received from their foreign collaborators, categorized as "Consulting Engineer's Service" by the original authority. The Commissioner (Appeals) directed a pre-deposit of a certain amount, which the appellants failed to comply with, resulting in the dismissal of their appeal for non-compliance with Section 35 of the Central Excise Act. 2. The appellant contended that the service received was not "Consulting Engineer's Service" but rather "Scientific or Technical Consultancy," which became taxable from a specific date. The Tribunal noted that the show-cause notice did not mention the nature of service as "Scientific or Technical Consultancy" from the specified date. It was established that providing technical know-how does not equate to providing Consulting Engineer's Service. Thus, the appellant had a prima facie case against the demand of Service Tax and penalty, warranting a waiver of pre-deposit. 3. The Tribunal, after reviewing the submissions, set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal by remanding it back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a merit-based decision without insisting on any pre-deposit. The directive was to ensure the appeal is disposed of in compliance with the law and principles of natural justice, emphasizing the need for a fair consideration of the case without the burden of pre-deposit requirements.
|
