1983 (1) TMI 76 - HC - Income Tax

Summary

Issues:
1. Deductibility of amount transferred to contingency reserve from chargeable profits under Super Profits Tax Act, 1963.
2. Inclusion of credit balance in contingency reserve for computing capital under Super Profits Tax Act, 1963.
3. Treatment of amount in charity reserve for computing capital under Super Profits Tax Act, 1963.

Analysis:
The High Court of Delhi was presented with three key issues regarding the super profits tax assessment of the respondent-assessee for the assessment year 1963-64. The first issue revolved around whether the amount of Rs. 7,50,000 transferred to a contingency reserve account should be deductible from chargeable profits under the Super Profits Tax Act, 1963. The court examined the nature of the reserve and concluded that it did not relate to any liability ascertainable with accuracy, making it an appropriation after profits were determined, hence qualifying as a reserve. The Tribunal's decision to treat this amount as a reserve was upheld based on the distinction between reserves and provisions established in previous judgments.

The second issue involved the consideration of the credit balance of Rs. 56,62,050 in the contingency reserve account for computing the company's capital under the Super Profits Tax Act, 1963. The court found that this balance, along with the amount transferred, formed part of the company's capital as reserves, not deferred liabilities or provisions. The Tribunal's decision to include this balance in the capital was deemed justified based on the balance-sheet analysis and the absence of any existing contingency related to the reserve.

The third issue pertained to the treatment of the amount of Rs. 1,20,956 in a charity reserve account for computing the company's capital under the Super Profits Tax Act, 1963. The court determined that this amount did not represent an existing liability and was appropriately classified as a reserve. As long as the amount remained with the company, it was considered part of the company's capital. The court, therefore, answered all three questions in favor of the assessee and against the Department, emphasizing the distinction between reserves and provisions in determining the company's capital under the Super Profits Tax Act, 1963.