Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2018 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (5) TMI 2010 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Addition of alleged purchases
2. Confirmation of interest charged under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C

Issue 1: Addition of alleged purchases
The appellant challenged the order confirming the addition of Rs. 13,06,000 on account of alleged purchases, which was 12.50% of Rs. 1,04,46,243. The appellant, engaged in the metals business, declared total income at Rs. 3,55,984 for the relevant year. The Assessing Officer (AO) received information indicating bogus purchase bills, leading to notices under the IT Act. The AO made additions on purchases @ 12.5%, considering them as bogus. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dismissed the appeal. The appellant argued that genuine purchases were made, supported by invoices, delivery challans, ledger accounts, and bank statements. The appellant contended that the high GP estimate by revenue authorities was unreasonable. The ITAT noted various decisions supporting the appellant's argument that non-appearance of suppliers doesn't prove purchases were not made. The ITAT found the AO's basis for disallowance lacked conclusive evidence and upheld the appellant's documentary evidence authenticity. The ITAT modified the addition to Rs. 2,28,819, considering existing GP and sales tax payments.

Issue 2: Confirmation of interest charged under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C
The judgment did not provide detailed analysis or discussion specific to the confirmation of interest charged under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C. The focus of the judgment primarily revolved around the addition of alleged purchases and the related evidence and arguments presented by the appellant.

In conclusion, the ITAT partially allowed the appeal, modifying the addition of alleged purchases and providing detailed reasoning based on documentary evidence and legal precedents. The judgment highlighted the importance of thorough investigation and evidence evaluation in assessing alleged transactions, emphasizing the need for a rationale judgment based on the provisions of the IT Act.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates