Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2014 (5) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2014 (5) TMI 1201 - HC - Companies Law


Issues:
1. Sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.
2. Compliance with statutory requirements for amalgamation.
3. Transfer of property, rights, and liabilities to the Transferee Company.
4. Clarification on RBI regulations for NBFCs in the context of amalgamation.
5. Confirmation of approval by Shareholders and Creditors for the scheme.

Analysis:
Issue 1: The judgment involves a second motion joint Petition filed seeking sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation of multiple Transferor Companies with a Transferee Company under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The Petitioner Companies had previously filed for dispensation of meetings, which was allowed by the Court. The Official Liquidator and Regional Director provided reports in favor of the scheme, indicating no objections or complaints against it.

Issue 2: The Court granted sanction to the Scheme of Amalgamation after considering the reports of the Official Liquidator and Regional Director, along with the absence of objections from any party. The Petitioner Companies were directed to comply with statutory requirements within 30 days, and upon the scheme coming into effect, the Transferor Companies would stand dissolved without winding up.

Issue 3: It was clarified that the order did not exempt the scheme from payment of stamp duty or any other charges. All property, rights, and liabilities of the Transferor Companies were to be transferred to the Transferee Company without the need for further action, in accordance with sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956.

Issue 4: The judgment addressed concerns regarding RBI regulations for NBFCs, stating that obtaining "No Objection" from the RBI for the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation was not required for the involved companies. The Court directed that if any violation of RBI provisions was found, the Directors of the Transferor Company would be liable, irrespective of the scheme's sanction.

Issue 5: The judgment confirmed that no objections were received from any party regarding the amalgamation scheme. The approval of Shareholders and Creditors, along with the reports from the Official Liquidator and Regional Director, supported the grant of sanction to the scheme. The Petitioner Companies agreed to deposit a sum in the Common Pool fund of the Official Liquidator voluntarily.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates