9911796707
|
Home
Issues: Jurisdiction of civil court under Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961
Analysis: The plaintiffs filed a suit seeking a declaration of ownership of land and injunction against Gram Panchayat interference. The Panchayat contended that the civil court lacked jurisdiction under section 13 of the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961. The trial court initially held it had jurisdiction based on the title issue. However, the High Court concluded that the suit was not maintainable before the civil court due to Act provisions. The Act defines 'Shamlat deh' and post-amendment, sections 11, 12, and 13 govern rights and jurisdiction. Section 11 allows claims on land vested in Panchayat, with Collector deciding and Commissioner hearing appeals. Section 12 mandates finality of Collector/Commissioner orders, barring court challenges. Section 13 restricts civil court jurisdiction on shamlat deh matters or actions under the Act. The plaintiffs avoided claiming the land wasn't shamlat deh but challenged Panchayat's right based on revenue records. Despite not directly raising shamlat deh issue, the civil court couldn't assert jurisdiction as the Act bars such suits. A cited case allowed a civil court suit as the plaintiff didn't claim land ownership against Panchayat, unlike the present case. The High Court's decision was upheld, emphasizing that the Collector, not the civil court, must decide shamlat deh matters under the Act. The plaintiffs' failure to address shamlat deh directly prevented civil court jurisdiction. The petition was dismissed, affirming the High Court's judgment. In conclusion, the judgment clarifies the limited jurisdiction of civil courts under the Punjab Village Common Lands (Regulation) Act, 1961, emphasizing the exclusive authority of the Collector to decide shamlat deh issues, thereby upholding the Act's provisions and restricting civil court interference in such matters.
|
