Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2019 (6) TMI Tri This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (6) TMI 1559 - Tri - Insolvency and BankruptcyWithdrawal of application - Prayer to recall the order - section 9 of the IB Code - HELD THAT - On filing of the instant application notice was issued to the IRP. The IRP appeared through its conducting lawyer and stated that in view of his appointment he has issued notice for convening the meeting of COC and further submitted that he has no objection provided his dues are cleared and submitted that approximately ₹ 8 lacs have been spent by the IRP. However, in support of such contention no documents and/or payment receipt or any invoice filed in respect of the expenditure incurred. Since, party has settled mutually, I found no reason to reject the petition so filed by the petitioner jointly for withdrawal of the application at this stage relying on a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Swiss Ribbons vs. Union of India 2019 (1) TMI 1508 - SUPREME COURT . Application allowed.
Issues:
Application for recalling order under section 9 of IB Code due to settlement between parties. Analysis: The judgment pertains to an application jointly filed by the Petitioner and Respondent to recall an order dated 29.05.2019 passed by the Bench in CP(IB) 26/2019 under section 9 of the IB Code, following a settlement between the parties. Initially, the application was admitted, and an IRP was appointed with directions under section 15 of the Code. Subsequently, the Corporate Debtor agreed to pay the outstanding amount along with interest, leading to consent terms being entered into on 19.06.2019. The IRP, upon notice of the application, mentioned expenses of approximately &8377; 8 lacs incurred but failed to provide supporting documents. Given the mutual settlement, the Tribunal referred to a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Swiss Ribbons vs. Union of India, emphasizing the collective nature of proceedings under the Code and the necessity to consult the overseeing body before individual settlements. The Tribunal allowed the application for withdrawal based on this premise, recalling the CIRP and disposing of the main IB Petition as withdrawn. In line with the observations and conditions stated in the judgment, the Interlocutory Application No.362 of 2019 in CP(IB) No.26/9/NCLT/AHMD/2019 was deemed successful and allowed. Consequently, the CIRP concerning the Corporate Debtor of the mentioned case was recalled, and the primary IB Petition was disposed of as withdrawn. The Tribunal's decision was influenced by the principles highlighted in the Swiss Ribbons case, emphasizing the importance of the collective resolution process and the need for consultation before individual settlements in insolvency proceedings.
|