9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
The judgment involves the disallowance of interest paid by the assessee in two assessment years, A.Y. 2003-04 and A.Y. 2005-06. A.Y. 2003-04: The appellant challenged the disallowance of interest of Rs. 1,02,931 out of the net interest paid of Rs. 3,64,977. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the disallowance citing lack of nexus between the advances received and the interest-free loans given to M/s. Chetan Steel Co. The Assessing Officer (AO) determined the total income at Rs. 18,64,940, disallowing Rs. 1,02,931 of interest paid by the assessee. The First Appellate Authority (FAA) also confirmed the disallowance. The appellant argued that the interest expenditure was justified as it was funded by interest-free capital and loans. The Tribunal found in favor of the assessee, stating that the burden of proof had been met and the disallowance lacked sufficient evidence. A.Y. 2005-06: In this assessment year, the disallowance of interest of Rs. 80,489 and bank charges of Rs. 51,999 against interest income received was contested. The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the disallowance due to the lack of explanation regarding the nexus between interest-free funds and their utilization for interest-free advances. The Tribunal decided in favor of the assessee based on similar grounds as the A.Y. 2003-04 judgment. Ground No. 2 was dismissed as the assessee did not press the same. The Tribunal allowed the appeal for A.Y. 2003-04 and partly allowed the appeal for A.Y. 2005-06, emphasizing the importance of establishing a clear nexus between interest payments and the source of funds.
|
