9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: The judgment addresses three questions of law raised by the revenue in the appeal.
Question (i): The issue is whether the Tribunal was correct in directing the Assessing Officer (A.O) to allow the assessee's claim of expenditure on oil and gas fields as revenue expenditure, despite it being argued that these were preliminary expenses not related to the business activity. The court noted that a similar question raised previously had been rejected, and therefore, the first question could not be entertained. Question (ii): The dispute revolves around allowing depreciation on the written down value of assets taken over from Essar Gujarat Ltd in the assessment year 1993-94. The Tribunal had accepted the written down value as claimed by the assessee for that year, and depreciation was allowed accordingly. The court found no fault in the Tribunal's decision for that year, and thus, the second question could not be entertained. Question (iii): The issue is whether the Tribunal was correct in directing the A.O to exclude profits from branches in Oman and Qatar, considering the assessee is a resident of India and should be taxed on its entire income in India as per section 5(1) of the Income Tax Act. Similar to the first question, a similar issue raised previously had been rejected, leading to the dismissal of the third question. In conclusion, the appeal was dismissed based on the court's analysis and findings on the three questions of law raised by the revenue.
|
