9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (8) TMI 1671 - HC - Income TaxAssessment of trust - depreciation allowable as application of income on charitable objects - Double deduction - HELD THAT - Substantial questions of law which have been framed in these appeals have been answered against the Revenue as relying on RAJASTHAN AND GUJARATI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION POONA 2017 (12) TMI 1067 - SUPREME COURT . - Decided against revenue.
Issues:
- Whether the assessee could claim depreciation on capital assets even though the expenditure on such assets was allowed as a deduction? - Whether the assessee would be entitled to claim depreciation even if the assets were not used in any business carried on by it? Analysis: 1. The appeals were filed by the appellant/Revenue under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, against the common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Bench 'A', Chennai, for the assessment years 2005-06 and 2006-07. 2. The substantial questions of law raised in the appeals were whether the assessee could claim depreciation on capital assets despite the expenditure on those assets being allowed as a deduction, and whether the assessee could claim depreciation even if the assets were not used in any business carried on by it as required under Section 32. 3. The learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Revenue acknowledged that the substantial questions of law framed in the appeals had been answered against the Revenue by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in a specific case, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. 4. The judgment was based on the precedent set by the Supreme Court in CIT vs. Rajasthan and Gujarati Charitable Foundation, where it was established that the assessee could claim depreciation on capital assets even if the expenditure on those assets was allowed as a deduction, and that the assessee could be entitled to claim depreciation even without using the assets in any business carried on by it. 5. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the appeals, ruling in favor of the assessee and answering the substantial questions of law against the Revenue, in line with the Supreme Court's decision. No costs were awarded in this judgment.
|
