9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2019 (6) TMI 1622 - AT - Income TaxTP Adjustment - comparable selection - Motilal Oswal Private Equity Advisors Pvt. Ltd - HELD THAT - As relying on NEW SILK ROUTE ADVISORS PVT. LTD 2018 (11) TMI 1769 - ITAT MUMBAI , TEMASEK HOLDINGS ADVISORS INDIA (P.) LTD. 2017 (8) TMI 1490 - ITAT MUMBAI , WELLS FARGO REAL ESTATE ADVISORS PVT. LTD. 2018 (1) TMI 931 - ITAT MUMBAI , AVENUE ASIA ADVISORS PVT. LIMITED 2017 (9) TMI 1295 - DELHI HIGH COURT therein conclude that Motilal Oswal Equity Advisors Pvt. ltd. cannot be treated as a comparable to the assessee. Ladder up Corporate Advisors Pvt. Ltd cannot be treated as a comparable to the assessee. See M/S. GUGGENHEIM CAPITAL MANAGEMENT (ASIA) PRIVATE LIMITED 2019 (2) TMI 1817 - ITAT MUMBAI , TATA ASSET MANAGEMENT LTD. VERSUS DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2 (3) ) (1) , MUMBAI 2019 (3) TMI 1883 - ITAT MUMBAI and BLACKSTONE ADVISORS INDIA PVT. LTD. AND VICE-VERSA 2018 (11) TMI 1732 - ITAT MUMBAI Cyber Media Research Ltd. (formerly IDC India Ltd.) was engaged in rendering market research and management consultancy services, and was also a premier provider of market intelligence and advisory services, therefore, it was functionally comparable to investment advisory providers. See NEW SILK ROUTE ADVISORS PVT. LTD. VERSUS ASSTT. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 7 (2) (2) , MUMBAI AND VICE-VERSA 2018 (11) TMI 1769 - ITAT MUMBAI Thus we direct the A.O to exclude the two comparables which were selected by the TPO viz. (i) Motilal Oswal Pvt. Equity Advisors Pvt. Ltd; and (ii) Ladder up Corporate Advisors Pvt. Ltd. from the final list of the comparables. At the same time, the A.O is directed to include Cyber Media Research Ltd. (formerly IDC India Ltd.) in the final list of comparables.
Issues Involved:
1. Adjustment to the Appellant's international transaction of provision of Investment Advisory Services. 2. Rejection of the Transfer Pricing Study maintained by the Appellant. 3. Exclusion of certain comparables by the AO/TPO. 4. Inclusion of functionally incomparable companies by the AO/TPO. 5. Non-application of multiple year data for comparable companies. 6. Non-allowance of credit of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS). Detailed Analysis: 1. Adjustment to the Appellant's International Transaction: The Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) upheld the action of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax (AO) and the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) in making an adjustment of ?12,14,10,530 to the Appellant's international transaction of providing Investment Advisory Services. The TPO had initially proposed a set of three comparables, which were subsequently adjusted by the DRP, resulting in a final adjustment by the AO. 2. Rejection of the Transfer Pricing Study: The DRP upheld the rejection of the Transfer Pricing Study maintained by the Appellant and the fresh search subsequently submitted. The TPO had rejected the initial set of five comparables proposed by the assessee and selected three new comparables based on a single year updated margin. 3. Exclusion of Certain Comparables: The DRP upheld the exclusion of comparables such as Cyber Media Research Ltd., Frontline Venture Services Private Limited, and Primary Real Estate Advisors Private Limited by the AO/TPO. The TPO observed that these companies were not functionally comparable to the assessee, which was engaged in providing investment advisory services. 4. Inclusion of Functionally Incomparable Companies: The DRP upheld the inclusion of Motilal Oswal Private Equity Advisors Pvt. Ltd. and Ladderup Corporate Advisory Pvt. Ltd. in the final set of companies for determining the arm's length price. However, the Tribunal found that Motilal Oswal Private Equity Advisors Pvt. Ltd. and Ladderup Corporate Advisory Pvt. Ltd. were not functionally comparable to the assessee, based on previous judicial pronouncements and functional profiles. 5. Non-Application of Multiple Year Data: The DRP upheld the AO/TPO's decision to use data for the financial year 2010-11 alone, rejecting the application of multiple year data for comparable companies. The Tribunal did not specifically address this issue in detail in the judgment. 6. Non-Allowance of Credit of TDS: The issue of non-allowance of credit of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) amounting to ?73,78,312 was raised by the appellant. However, the Tribunal's judgment primarily focused on the comparability analysis and adjustment issues, without providing a detailed analysis on the TDS credit issue. Tribunal's Conclusion: The Tribunal directed the AO to exclude Motilal Oswal Private Equity Advisors Pvt. Ltd. and Ladderup Corporate Advisory Pvt. Ltd. from the final list of comparables and to include Cyber Media Research Ltd. (formerly IDC India Ltd.). The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee and dismissed the appeal of the revenue, thereby providing relief to the assessee from the adjustments made by the AO/TPO. Order Pronouncement: The order was pronounced in the open court on 11.06.2019, allowing the appeal of the assessee and dismissing the appeal of the revenue.
|
