9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Legality of adding petitioners as accused under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. Interpretation of Section 88 of the Code regarding bail for accused added during trial. Analysis: Issue 1: Legality of adding petitioners as accused under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure: The case involved the aggrieved petitioners challenging the order of the trial Judge adding them as accused persons in a criminal case. The petitioners argued that since they were not charge-sheeted by the police but were added as accused by the trial Judge under Section 319 of the Code, they should not be required to seek release on bail upon their appearance in court. The petitioners relied on legal precedents to support their contention. However, the Additional Government Advocate opposed this argument, asserting that upon appearance in response to summons, the petitioners would be taken to judicial custody, and any bail application would be considered based on the nature and gravity of the offense. The Court held that arrest of the accused is part of the investigation process, and once a person is arraigned as accused under Section 319, they stand on the same footing as other accused persons, necessitating judicial custody upon appearance. Issue 2: Interpretation of Section 88 of the Code regarding bail for accused added during trial: The Court addressed the interpretation of Section 88 of the Code concerning bail for persons added as accused during trial. It was emphasized that the provisions of bail as outlined in Chapter XXXIII of the Code apply to such individuals, and they cannot be presumed innocent solely because they were not charge-sheeted by the police. The Court highlighted that bail applications for accused added during trial would be evaluated based on the prosecution's evidence, and Section 88 cannot be construed to exempt such individuals from judicial custody or bail provisions. The Court underscored that allowing accused added during trial to avoid judicial custody without proper bail procedures would have negative consequences, undermining the legal process and public perception of law enforcement. In conclusion, the Court dismissed the criminal miscellaneous application filed by the petitioners, directing the trial Judge to take necessary steps to apprehend the petitioners if they fail to appear. The judgment clarified the legal obligations regarding the arrest, judicial custody, and bail provisions applicable to accused persons added during trial under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
|
