Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2018 (7) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (7) TMI 2211 - AT - Income TaxMaintainability of appeal - low tax effect - Disallowance u/s 36(1)(iii) deleted by CIT-A - HELD THAT - As noticed that the tax effect involved in this appeal is less than ₹ 20.00 lakhs and the issue contested herein also apparently does not fall in any of the exceptions specified in the Circular. Accordingly we dismiss the appeal of the revenue in limine. However, the revenue is given liberty to move miscellaneous application seeking recall of this order, if it is found that the issue contested in this appeal falls in any of the exception provided in paragraph 10 of the Circular.
Issues involved: Appeal challenging order deleting interest disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act for assessment year 2003-04. Tax effect less than ?20.00 lakhs. Application of Circular No.3/2018 by CBDT regarding appeal eligibility based on tax effect.
Issue 1: Interest disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) of the Act The revenue filed an appeal against the order of Ld CIT(A)-2, Mumbai, deleting interest disallowance of ?52.03 lakhs under section 36(1)(iii) for the assessment year 2003-04. The revenue was aggrieved by the decision of Ld CIT(A) in this regard. Issue 2: Tax effect and Circular No.3/2018 by CBDT During the hearing, it was noted that the quantum in dispute was ?52.03 lakhs, with a tax effect less than ?20.00 lakhs. The CBDT had issued Circular No.3/2018, which stated that the revenue cannot pursue an appeal if the tax effect is ?20.00 lakhs or less, unless falling under specified exceptions. The Ld D.R. sought time to obtain a certificate confirming that the grounds of appeal did not fall under any exceptions, but could not provide evidence to support this. Analysis: The Tribunal observed that the tax effect involved in the appeal was less than ?20.00 lakhs, and the issue did not appear to fall under any exceptions specified in Circular No.3/2018. Consequently, the appeal of the revenue was dismissed summarily. However, the revenue was granted the liberty to file a miscellaneous application if it could establish that the issue contested in the appeal fell within the exceptions outlined in the Circular. Conclusion: The Tribunal, considering the tax effect and the provisions of Circular No.3/2018, dismissed the revenue's appeal regarding the interest disallowance under section 36(1)(iii) for the assessment year 2003-04. The order was pronounced on 17.7.2018, and the revenue was given the option to seek a recall of the order if the issue contested was found to fall within the exceptions specified in the Circular.
|