Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2011 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2011 (2) TMI 1597 - AT - Income Tax

Issues involved: The judgment involves issues related to the deletion of addition by the CIT(A) and the deduction u/s 80P(2)(e) of the Income-tax Act in the Department's appeal, as well as the deduction claimed u/s 80P(2)(d) on dividend and interest income in the Assessee's appeal.

Department's Appeal - ITA No. 1081/Chandi/2010:
The Department appealed against the CIT(A)'s deletion of an addition of Rs. 14,80,41,864 and the allowance of deduction u/s 80P(2)(e). The appellant, an apex cooperative society, procured agricultural commodities for the Government and received income for storage charges. The CIT(A) allowed the deduction u/s 80P(2)(e) based on previous Tribunal orders, but the High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that storing was part of the business activity. Consequently, the Department's appeal was allowed, as the issue was decided in favor of the Department by the High Court.

Assessee's Appeal - ITA No. 1095/Chandi/2010:
The Assessee appealed regarding the deduction claimed u/s 80P(2)(d) on dividend and interest income. Both parties acknowledged that a similar issue had been addressed by the Tribunal in earlier years. The Tribunal remitted the issue back to the AO for fresh adjudication in accordance with the law. As the issue was identical to previous years and for consistency, the matter was restored to the AO for a fresh decision. The order passed by the CIT(A)/Assessing Officer was set aside, and the appeal filed by the Assessee was treated as allowed for statistical purposes.

In conclusion, the Department's appeal was allowed based on the High Court's ruling, while the Assessee's appeal was remitted back to the AO for fresh adjudication in line with previous Tribunal orders for consistency.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates