9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2021 (1) TMI 1198 - AAAR - GSTLevy of GST - supply of service by the applicant Corporation in recovery of expenses from DISCOMs as well as UPPTCL and other power companies by way of book entries - inclusion of incidental expenses in value of supply - recovery against certain expenses such as interest cost salary depreciation etc. - transfer of miscellaneous incomes of the applicant Corporation to DISCOMs UPPTCL and other power companies - taxable expenditure will be allowed as ITC to the corporation for further adjustment of GST payable on recovery of expenses by way of book entries - difference of opinion. HELD THAT - In view of difference of opinion between the Members of Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling for Goods and Service Tax Uttar Pradesh no ruling can be issued on the questions raised by the Appellant in terms of the provisions of Sub Section 3 of Section 101 of CGST Act 2017. Thus the Advance Ruling issued vide Order IN RE M/S. UP POWER CORPORATION LTD. 2020 (9) TMI 1226 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULLING UTTAR PRADESH by the Authority for Advance Ruling Uttar Pradesh is deemed to be not in operation.
Issues Involved:
1. Supply of service and GST liability on recovery of expenses from DISCOMs. 2. Applicability of incidental expenses inclusion clause under Section 15(2) of CGST Act. 3. GST liability on recovery of exempt or non-taxable expenses. 4. GST applicability on transfer of miscellaneous incomes. 5. Eligibility of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on GST paid on taxable expenditure. Issue-wise Detailed Analysis: I. Supply of Service and GST Liability on Recovery of Expenses from DISCOMs: The Appellant, a State Government undertaking, is responsible for the purchase and supply of electricity to DISCOMs. The Appellant operates on a 'no profit and no loss basis,' passing on the total power procurement cost to DISCOMs. The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) ruled that the Appellant is liable to pay GST on the operational and management (O&M) expenses charged from its subsidiary companies. The Appellant argued that these expenses are part of the consideration for the supply of electricity, which is exempt from GST. However, the Appellate Authority observed that the Appellant and DISCOMs are separate business entities, and the recovery of expenses by book entries constitutes consideration under Section 2(31) of the CGST Act. The activities related to O&M expenses meet the criteria of supply under Section 7(1) of the CGST Act and are liable to GST. II. Applicability of Incidental Expenses Inclusion Clause under Section 15(2) of CGST Act: The AAR did not address this issue separately as it became infructuous following the ruling on the first issue. The Appellant contended that if there is no supply of service, the incidental expenses inclusion clause under Section 15(2) should not apply. The Appellate Authority upheld the AAR's decision that the recovery of O&M expenses is taxable, making this issue irrelevant. III. GST Liability on Recovery of Exempt or Non-taxable Expenses: The AAR ruled that GST would be chargeable on specific heads such as interest cost, salary, and depreciation. The Appellant argued that these expenses do not attract GST as they are exempt or non-taxable. The Appellate Authority upheld the AAR's decision, stating that the activities performed by the Appellant for employees of DISCOMs or any activity performed by the employees of the Appellant for DISCOMs cannot be classified under "employer-employee relationship" and are liable to GST. IV. GST Applicability on Transfer of Miscellaneous Incomes: The AAR ruled that income shared with the subsidiaries by the Appellant would be chargeable to GST. The Appellant argued that the transfer of miscellaneous incomes should not attract GST. The Appellate Authority upheld the AAR's decision, stating that the transfer of miscellaneous incomes constitutes a supply and is liable to GST. V. Eligibility of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on GST Paid on Taxable Expenditure: The AAR ruled that while ITC may be availed in principle, its admissibility would depend on the provisions of Section 16 & 17 of the CGST Act read with Rule 36 of the CGST Rules. The Appellant argued that they are eligible to avail ITC of GST paid on supplies received and used in the course or furtherance of their business. The Appellate Authority upheld the AAR's decision, stating that the eligibility for ITC would be subject to the relevant provisions of the CGST Act and Rules. Separate Judgments by Members: The Member (CGST) concluded that the activities related to O&M expenses are taxable and not naturally bundled with the supply of electricity. The Member (SGST) opined that the expenses are part and parcel of the supply of electricity, which is exempt from GST. Due to the difference of opinion between the Members, no ruling could be issued, and the Advance Ruling issued by the AAR is deemed to be not in operation.
|
