Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2020 (5) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (5) TMI 709 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues Involved:
1. Approval of the closure of liquidation process.
2. Sale of the corporate debtor as a going concern.
3. Distribution of proceeds from the sale.
4. Pending avoidance application.
5. Claims and liabilities of operational creditors.
6. Compliance with Liquidation Process Regulations.

Detailed Analysis:

1. Approval of the Closure of Liquidation Process:
The application was filed by the Liquidator to approve the closure of the liquidation process of K.T.C. Foods Pvt. Ltd. under Regulation 45(3)(a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Liquidation Process) Regulations, 2016. The Tribunal noted that the liquidation process commenced on 31.05.2019, and the assets were sold as a going concern to Shiv Shakti Inter Globe Exports Private Limited. The Tribunal directed the closure of the liquidation process without the dissolution of K.T.C. Foods Pvt. Ltd.

2. Sale of the Corporate Debtor as a Going Concern:
The Liquidator sold K.T.C. Foods as a going concern through an e-auction, with Shiv Shakti being the highest bidder at ?18,45,86,646/-. The sale notice was issued on 05.11.2019, and the sale was completed on 26.11.2019. The Tribunal noted that Regulation 32(e) allows the sale of the corporate debtor as a going concern, and the closure of the liquidation process was directed without dissolution.

3. Distribution of Proceeds from the Sale:
The proceeds from the sale were distributed as per Section 53 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Tribunal noted that the financial creditor Oriental Bank of Commerce received only 13.17% of the admitted amount, and the operational creditors received no distribution. The Tribunal directed that any amount recovered from the pending avoidance application (CA 510/2019) be distributed to the financial creditors and, if excess, to the operational creditors.

4. Pending Avoidance Application:
The Tribunal addressed the issue of whether the liquidation process can be closed pending the avoidance application (CA 510/2019). It was noted that Regulation 44(1) allows the liquidation process to be completed notwithstanding the pendency of any avoidance application. The Tribunal directed the Liquidator to diligently pursue the pending application and that any amount recovered be distributed as per the directions.

5. Claims and Liabilities of Operational Creditors:
IA No. 132/2020 was filed by an operational creditor seeking payment of claims from Shiv Shakti, the purchaser of K.T.C. Foods. The Tribunal rejected the application, stating that the purchaser is not liable for claims that accrued before the e-auction date. The Tribunal referenced the judgment in IA No. 1038/2019, which held that the purchaser is relieved of liabilities arising prior to the e-auction date.

6. Compliance with Liquidation Process Regulations:
The Tribunal noted the compliance with the Liquidation Process Regulations, 2016. The Liquidator submitted Form H, showing no deviations or non-compliance. The Tribunal highlighted that the stakeholders' Consultation Committee was not constituted due to the commencement date of the liquidation process being before the amendment regulations. However, no adverse inference was drawn as there were no objections from stakeholders.

Conclusion:
The Tribunal approved the closure of the liquidation process of K.T.C. Foods Pvt. Ltd. without its dissolution. The sale of the corporate debtor as a going concern to Shiv Shakti was acknowledged, and the distribution of proceeds was directed as per Section 53. The pending avoidance application was to be pursued by the Liquidator, and any recovered amount was to be distributed to the financial and operational creditors. The Tribunal also rejected the claims of operational creditors against the purchaser, Shiv Shakti.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates