9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
The issues involved in the judgment include an eviction petition filed by a registered society against the legal heirs of a deceased employee, the legality of the possession of premises by the legal heirs, and the imposition of costs on the petitioners for illegal occupation. Eviction Petition and Legal Heirs' Possession: The deceased employee was allotted premises for his residence as an incident of employment by the respondent society. After his death, the legal heirs continued to possess the premises illegally, despite one of the sons being given service on compassionate grounds and later resigning. The eviction petition was filed by the society on the grounds of requiring the premises for its activities. The Rent Controller and the Appellate Rent Control Tribunal (ARCT) found in favor of the society, stating that the legal heirs had no right to continue in the premises after the death of the employee and his son's resignation. Validity of ARCT Order: The petitioners challenged the ARCT order, arguing that the society was not a corporate body as observed by the ARCT. However, the court rejected this argument, stating that the society being a registered society under the Societies Registration Act was equivalent to a corporate body for legal purposes. The court emphasized that the petitioners had no valid grounds for their continued illegal possession of the premises. Imposition of Costs: The court highlighted the issue of frivolous litigation and illegal possession, emphasizing the need to deter such actions. The court imposed costs on the petitioners, amounting to the average market rent for the 292 months of illegal possession, totaling to Rs. 14,60,000, along with litigation expenses and counsel's fees. The petition was dismissed with costs of Rs. 15,10,000 to be recovered from the petitioners jointly and severally. The petitioners were directed to vacate the premises within 30 days, with provisions for user charges if they failed to comply. Judicial System and Frivolous Litigation: The judgment underscored the detrimental impact of frivolous litigation on the judicial system, calling for measures to discourage unjust enrichment through legal means. The court emphasized the need to hold wrongdoers accountable for prolonging litigation and perpetuating illegal acts, ensuring that the costs incurred reflect the deprivation suffered by the rightful parties. The court stressed the importance of upholding justice and deterring those who misuse legal processes for personal gain.
|
