1996 (1) TMI 481 - SC - Indian Laws

Summary

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, stating that the appellant cannot be ejected from the premises in his possession except in accordance with law. The compromise decree granting possession to the respondents was found to be a nullity as the appellant was independently in possession as a tenant. The respondents can proceed against Harkesh Rai Agarwal in accordance with law for execution of the compromise decree.