Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + AAAR GST - 2020 (8) TMI AAAR This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (8) TMI 907 - AAAR - GST


Issues Involved:
1. Classification of "Papad and papad pipes" (commonly known as Fryums).
2. Applicable rate of CGST on "Papad and papad pipes" (commonly known as Fryums).

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Classification of "Papad and papad pipes" (commonly known as Fryums):

The appellant, M/s. Alisha Foods, argued that their product, "Fried Fryums," should be classified under sub-heading 1905 90 40 as "Papad" because the manufacturing process and ingredients are similar to those of traditional papad. They cited the Shivshakti Gold Finger case where the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that papads of all shapes and sizes are covered under the entry "Papad."

The Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) initially classified "Fried Fryums" under Tariff Item 2106 90 99, which pertains to "Food preparations not elsewhere specified or included." The appellant contested this classification, arguing that "Fried Fryums" should be classified as "Papad" under Chapter 19 Heading 1905.

The Appellate Authority examined whether "Fried Fryums" could be considered "Papad" in common parlance. It observed that "Fried Fryums" are commonly known and used as "Namkeen" and not as "Papad." The Authority referred to the T.T.K. Pharma Ltd. case, where "Fry Snack Foods called Fryums" were considered "Namkeen" and not "Papad." Thus, the Authority concluded that "Fried Fryums" are not classifiable as "Papad" under Tariff item 1905 90 40.

2. Applicable rate of CGST on "Papad and papad pipes" (commonly known as Fryums):

The appellant argued that "Fried Fryums" should attract a lower GST rate applicable to "Papad." They contended that the classification under Tariff Item 2106 90 99, which attracts an 18% GST rate, was erroneous.

The Appellate Authority noted that Heading 2106 covers all kinds of edible preparations not elsewhere specified or included. Chapter Note 5 of Chapter 21 includes preparations for use either directly or after processing, such as cooking, dissolving, or boiling in water, milk, or other liquids. The term "such as" is illustrative and not exhaustive, implying that processing includes frying. Therefore, fried goods are covered under Chapter Head 2106, which is ready for human consumption.

Chapter Note 6 of Tariff item 2106 90 99 includes products commonly known as "Namkeen," "Mixtures," "Bhujia," "Chabena," or called by any other name. The Authority concluded that "Fried Fryums" are appropriately classifiable under Tariff item 2106 90 99.

The applicable GST rate is 18% (CGST 9% + SGST 9% or IGST 18%) as per Sl. No. 23 of Schedule III of Notification No. 1/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017, as amended, issued under the CGST Act, 2017, and corresponding notifications under the SGST Act, 2017, or IGST Act, 2017.

Conclusion:

The Appellate Authority upheld the AAR's classification of "Fried Fryums" under Tariff Item 2106 90 99 and confirmed the applicable GST rate of 18%. The appeal by M/s. Alisha Foods was dismissed, affirming that "Fried Fryums" are not classifiable as "Papad" and are subject to an 18% GST rate.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates