Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2016 (7) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (7) TMI 1656 - HC - Companies Law


Issues:
Reduction of share capital through special resolution under Companies Act, 1956.

Analysis:
The judgment deals with an application by a company seeking directions for reducing its share capital as per Clause 4(B) of its Articles of Association, which allows reduction by passing a Special Resolution in accordance with Sections 100 to 105 of the Companies Act, 1956. The company had already passed a Special Resolution at an Extra Ordinary General Meeting for reducing its share capital from Rs. 285,00,00,000 to Rs. 41,83,39,250. This reduction involved cancelling a specific number of equity shares and preference shares, adjusting against the debit balance of Profit & Loss Account, and paying a cash consideration to shareholders. The judgment also noted that there were no secured creditors, the unsecured creditor had consented in writing, and the proposed reduction would not adversely affect any creditors or the company's ordinary operations.

The court, after considering the application and the supporting affidavit, approved the reduction of share capital as per the company's proposal. It was highlighted that the procedure under Section 101(2) of the Companies Act, 1956 was dispensed with due to the absence of any compromise or arrangement with creditors, ensuring that the reduction would not impact the interests of creditors or the company's regular business operations. The judgment emphasized the compliance with the statutory provisions and the company's internal regulations, ensuring a lawful and transparent process for the reduction of share capital. By granting the approval for the reduction, the court validated the company's actions in line with the legal framework governing such corporate decisions.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates