9911796707
|
Home
Issues Involved:
Imposition of penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act based on deliberate concealment of income. Analysis: The judgment pertains to the imposition of a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The dispute arose when the assessing officer imposed a penalty on the assessee, which was later quashed by the Tribunal. The Tribunal held that there was no deliberate concealment on the part of the assessee in disclosing the return. It was noted that there was no material to indicate that the disputed materials actually belonged to the assessee, leading to the conclusion that no case for the imposition of a penalty was made out. The Tribunal set aside the order of penalty imposed by the Commissioner (Appeals). When the revenue sought a reference from the Tribunal under section 256(1) for a legal question, it was declined as the matter was deemed to be a question of fact rather than law. The High Court concurred with the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing that the issue did not involve any referable question of law but was a question of fact. The court noted that the imposition of a penalty on the assessee was a matter of discussion, and if a proper explanation was provided and accepted by the Tribunal, there was no need to disturb such findings. The High Court supported the Tribunal's decision not to refer the revenue's proposed question to the High Court for examination, as it did not involve any significant legal issue. Consequently, the court dismissed the application, agreeing with the Tribunal's reasoning, and no costs were awarded in the matter. In summary, the judgment revolves around the imposition of a penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, where the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, finding no deliberate concealment of income. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing that the matter was a question of fact rather than law, and there was no need for further legal scrutiny.
|
