Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + HC Indian Laws - 2009 (2) TMI HC This
Issues:
The issues involved in the judgment are the consideration of the petitioner's application for the post of staff nurse in the OBC category, the rejection of her application due to the late submission of the OBC certificate, and the denial of her candidature based on the timing of submitting the required certificate. Consideration of Application: The petitioner sought directions to consider her application for the post of staff nurse in the OBC category and to quash the results declared by the respondent. The petitioner, belonging to the 'Jaat' community recognized as OBC, applied for the post but faced rejection as she submitted the OBC certificate after the specified deadline. The court emphasized that being OBC is by birth, and the certificate only affirms this fact. Insisting on a pre-21st January 2008 certificate was deemed arbitrary. Legal Principles on Reservation: Caste-based reservation aims to address historical oppression and under-representation. The Constitution mandates equality for all citizens, with exceptions for disadvantaged groups. Reservation is a corrective measure to counter past discrimination and promote social and economic justice. The court cited Indra Sawhney v. Union of India to highlight the rationale and limitations of reservation policies. Late Submission of Certificates: The judgment referenced a previous case where SC/ST candidates were allowed to submit certificates post-application deadline. The court stressed that the purpose of the certificate is to affirm existing status, not create it. The objective of reservation is to provide equal opportunities and social justice, aligning with constitutional principles. Decision and Direction: The court extended the benefit of OBC category to the petitioner, directing the respondents to consider her application within a month and announce the result accordingly. The petitioner, who applied for the OBC certificate before the advertisement, should not suffer due to delays in certificate issuance. The judgment upheld the principles of equality and social justice in granting relief to the petitioner.
|