2013 (8) TMI 1176 - SCH - Indian Laws

Summary

Issues involved:
1. Special leave petitions against the order of the Madhya Pradesh High Court granting transit bail.
2. Surrender of Respondent No. 1 rendering the special leave petitions infructuous.
3. Concerns raised by the learned counsel for Respondent No. 1 regarding potential prejudice due to court observations.
4. Clarification by the Supreme Court regarding the impact of its observations on the bail claims of Respondent No. 1 and other accused.
5. Disposal of special leave petitions and criminal miscellaneous petitions.
6. Listing of a writ petition after two weeks.

The Supreme Court heard special leave petitions (SLP) challenging the Madhya Pradesh High Court's order granting transit bail to Respondent No. 1 for 60 days. Following the Respondent's surrender as per the Supreme Court's directive, the SLPs were deemed infructuous. The Respondent's counsel expressed concerns about potential prejudice arising from the Court's observations on bail matters. The High Court's order pertained to transit bail, while the Supreme Court's observations were on anticipatory bail, clarifying that they would not impact the Respondent's claims for temporary or regular bail before the Trial Court or High Court.

The Supreme Court further clarified that its observations would not prejudice the claims of any other accused seeking anticipatory or regular bail in the case before the High Court or any appropriate Court. Consequently, the special leave petitions and criminal miscellaneous petitions were disposed of. Additionally, a writ petition was scheduled for listing after a two-week period.