Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2019 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2019 (10) TMI 1568 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
Taxability of reimbursements of allocated costs under Management Services Agreement as fees for technical services or fees for included services under India-US DTAA.

Analysis:
1. The main issue in this case pertains to the taxability of reimbursements of allocated costs received by the non-resident appellant under the Management Services Agreement with an Indian company. The appellant contested that these reimbursements did not contain any income element and hence should not be taxed in India.

2. The Assessing Officer held that the payments for technical or consultancy services would fall under the definition of fees for technical services (FTS) under the India-US treaty if they make available any technical knowledge or skill to the recipient. The AO concluded that these services were taxable under FTS or royalties.

3. The Tribunal examined the Management Services Agreement and relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act and the India-US DTAA. The CIT (A) and the DRP in previous assessments for the appellant had deleted similar additions, emphasizing that the services provided were more in the nature of management services rather than fees for included services (FIS).

4. The Tribunal noted that the 'make available' clause was not satisfied in the present case, as per the provisions of Article 12(4) of the DTAA. The services provided were deemed to be more aligned with management services, and the 'make available' requirement for FTS/FIS was not met.

5. The DRP for a different assessment year also concurred that the 'make available' clause was not satisfied, and the services did not qualify as FIS under the DTAA. The revenue accepted the decisions for previous years, and no appeal was filed.

6. Considering the provisions of the DTAA and the specific clauses of the Management Services Agreement, the Tribunal concluded that the management services provided by the appellant could not be taxed as fees for technical services. As a result, the appeal of the assessee was allowed.

This detailed analysis highlights the key arguments, interpretations of relevant legal provisions, and the precedents set in previous assessments, leading to the ultimate decision in favor of the appellant regarding the taxability of the reimbursements under the Management Services Agreement.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates