Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2022 (6) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2022 (6) TMI 1434 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues:
1. Application under section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code by the Personal Guarantor for setting aside an order.
2. Interpretation of section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code regarding the interim moratorium period.
3. Stay of legal actions or proceedings against the Personal Guarantor during the interim moratorium period.

Analysis:

Issue 1: Application under section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
The application was filed by the Personal Guarantor of the Corporate Debtor seeking to set aside an order dated 17 February, 2022. The Court noted the relief sought by the Personal Guarantor and proceeded to analyze the submissions made by the Legal Counsel representing the parties involved in the case.

Issue 2: Interpretation of section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code
The Tribunal delved into a detailed analysis of section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, which deals with the interim moratorium period. The section outlines that during the interim moratorium period, all legal actions or proceedings pending in respect of any debt shall be stayed, and creditors are prohibited from initiating any legal action or proceeding in respect of any debt. The Tribunal emphasized the conjunctive interpretation of the section, highlighting that the interim moratorium applies to all debts, including personal debts of the debtor.

Issue 3: Stay of legal actions against the Personal Guarantor
Based on the interpretation of section 96 and the specific timeline of applications filed by the Financial Creditors, the Tribunal concluded that the interim moratorium against the Personal Guarantor commenced from the date of the first application, i.e., 09 July, 2021. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the application filed by the Personal Guarantor under section 60(5) of the Code, stayed the proceedings in the related case, recalled the previous order, and discharged the Resolution Professional appointed in the matter.

In conclusion, the Tribunal's judgment in this case focused on the correct interpretation of the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, particularly regarding the interim moratorium period and the implications for legal actions against the Personal Guarantor. The detailed analysis provided clarity on the application of the law in the specific context of the case, leading to the issuance of specific orders to address the issues raised by the parties involved.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates