Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2023 (10) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2023 (10) TMI 1365 - AT - Income Tax


Issues Involved:
The judgment involves the following issues:
1. Allowance of deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) for interest earned from Co-operative Banks.
2. Interpretation of deduction under section 80P(2)(d) as opposed to section 80P(4).
3. Consideration of written submissions and past decisions regarding similar deductions.
4. Condonation of delay in filing the appeal.

Issue 1: Allowance of Deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) for Interest Earned from Co-operative Banks:
The appeal was filed by the Navrang Basant Co-operative Housing Society Limited against the appellate order dismissing their appeal regarding the denial of deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) for interest earned from Co-operative Banks. The Assessing Officer rejected the claim for deduction under section 80P(2)(d) on the grounds that interest received from cooperative banks was not eligible for deduction under section 80P as they are not cooperative societies. The Tribunal, after considering the facts, held that the assessee, being a cooperative housing society and not a cooperative bank, was eligible for deduction u/s 80P(2) of the Act. The Tribunal reversed the order of the CIT (A) and allowed the deduction on interest income, citing relevant Supreme Court judgments to support its decision.

Issue 2: Interpretation of Deduction under Section 80P(2)(d) as Opposed to Section 80P(4):
The Assessing Officer contended that deduction under section 80P(2)(d) was not allowable as per sub-section 4 of section 80P of the Act. The Tribunal clarified that section 80P(4) denies deduction to cooperative banks only, not to cooperative housing societies like the appellant. By differentiating between the nature of the appellant's entity and a cooperative bank, the Tribunal upheld the eligibility of the appellant for deduction under section 80P(2)(d).

Issue 3: Consideration of Written Submissions and Past Decisions:
The appellant argued that the CIT (A) erred in not considering the written submissions filed, the decision of the CIT(A) for A.Y. 2015-16 in the appellant's own case, and decisions of the jurisdictional Tribunal where deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) was allowed for interest income earned from Co-operative Banks. The Tribunal reviewed these arguments and found merit in the appellant's contentions, ultimately allowing the deduction based on the appellant's status as a cooperative housing society.

Issue 4: Condonation of Delay in Filing the Appeal:
The appeal of the appellant was filed late, leading to a delay of 82 days. The appellant attributed the delay to not receiving the order of the CIT (A) in time. The Tribunal, following the principle that a pedantic approach should not be taken in condoning delays, accepted the appellant's explanation and condoned the delay. Despite objections from the Departmental Representative, the Tribunal allowed the appeal on its merits after considering the delay issue.

This judgment by the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai highlights the importance of correctly interpreting the provisions of the Income-tax Act, particularly regarding deductions for entities like cooperative housing societies. The Tribunal's decision to allow the deduction u/s 80P(2)(d) for interest income earned from Co-operative Banks in the case of the appellant sets a precedent based on the entity's nature and eligibility criteria specified in the relevant sections of the Act.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates