Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2020 (1) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2020 (1) TMI 1685 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
- Justification of confirming addition claimed as depreciation on Government Securities
- Failure to consider relevant judgment in the case
- Allowability of the claim for deduction on the deterioration of value of Government Securities

Analysis:
1. The appeal was filed by the Assessee against the order confirming the addition of Rs. 2,44,325 claimed as depreciation on Government Securities. The Assessee argued that the securities were stock-in-trade and should be valued at cost or market price, whichever is lower. The contention was that the depreciation on Government Securities was a systematic allocation of deterioration in value over its useful life, not as contemplated in section 32 of the Act.

2. The Assessee further argued that as per the Banking Regulation Act, every bank is required to invest in Government Securities to maintain reserve ratios. However, the Assessing Officer (A.O.) rejected the claim, stating that investments made to preserve Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR) are low interest bearing, with negligible cost value deterioration. The A.O. disallowed the claim, leading to the first statutory appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) who upheld the A.O.'s decision.

3. The Appellate Tribunal, after reviewing the relevant records and orders, found that the Assessee, being a Co-operative Bank, had to maintain certain investments to comply with SLR and CRR requirements. Considering Government Securities as part of liquid assets and stock-in-trade, the Tribunal allowed the deduction under section 37. The Tribunal cited precedents from Punjab and Haryana High Court and ITAT Pune Bench to support its decision, emphasizing that securities held by banks are akin to stock-in-trade.

4. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the A.O. to delete the addition of Rs. 2,44,325 claimed by the Assessee, thereby allowing the appeal filed by the Assessee. The judgment highlighted the specific nature of Government Securities for banks and the method of valuation followed by banking institutions, ultimately supporting the Assessee's claim for deduction based on the deterioration of the securities' value.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates