9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved:
Termination of services without prior approval of District Basic Education Officer in a recognized institution. Summary: Issue 1: Termination of services without prior approval The appellant, a teacher at a recognized institution, had her services terminated without obtaining prior approval from the District Basic Education Officer, as required by Rule-11 of U.P. Recognised Basic Schools Rules, 1975. The learned Single Judge initially held the termination invalid due to lack of prior approval but deemed no relief could be granted as the institution was not recognized at the time of the order. The appellant challenged this decision in a Special Appeal, contending that being a recognized institution at the time of termination, the lack of prior approval made the termination illegal. The High Court agreed, emphasizing that without prior approval, the termination was void and the appellant was entitled to relief. The judgment of the learned Single Judge was set aside, and the Special Appeal was allowed with no costs imposed. This summary highlights the key issues and details of the judgment, focusing on the termination of services without the necessary prior approval in a recognized educational institution.
|
