Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2016 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (4) TMI 443 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
1. Eligibility for exemption under notification no.67/95-CE for char/dolochar used in the generation of electricity.
2. Classification of char/dolochar under heading 2621.00.
3. Interpretation of the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Ahmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd.
4. Captive consumption of char/dolochar in the manufacture of sponge iron.
5. Duty liability on char/dolochar.

Analysis:

1. The case revolves around the eligibility of the respondents for exemption under notification no.67/95-CE for char/dolochar used in electricity generation. The Revenue challenged the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) upholding the exemption. The Revenue argued that since most of the electricity generated was not used in the factory, the exemption should be denied.

2. The Department contended that char/dolochar falls under heading 2621.00 and is not eligible for the exemption. It was emphasized that the char/dolochar is a product emerging from raw materials used in the manufacture of sponge iron, making it an excisable commodity.

3. The interpretation of the Hon'ble Supreme Court's decision in Ahmedabad Electricity Co. Ltd. was crucial. The Department claimed that the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in relying on this decision, stating that the facts of the present case differed as coal was used as a raw material, not as a fuel.

4. The issue of captive consumption of char/dolochar in the generation of electricity was examined. It was noted that most of the electricity generated in the respondent's unit was not solely produced using char/dolochar. The respondent argued that only a percentage of char/dolochar was used for electricity generation, with a significant portion used for sponge iron production.

5. The Tribunal's previous decision in the respondent's case held that char/dolochar is not liable to excise duty, aligning with the Supreme Court's decision in Ahmedabad Electricity Company Ltd. This further supported the respondent's position in the current appeal.

In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the exemption for char/dolochar used in electricity generation based on the captive consumption and the proportion of inputs utilized. The decision also highlighted the consistency with previous rulings and the application of relevant legal precedents.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates