Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2016 (6) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (6) TMI 277 - AT - Service Tax


Issues:
1. Stay application against order confirming service tax demand.
2. Classification of service tax liability under works contract or construction service.
3. Applicability of legal precedents - CCE & Kerala vs Larsen Toubro Ltd and Nagarjuna Construction Co. Ltd Vs UOI.
4. Grant of total waiver of pre-deposit and stay on recovery till appeal disposal.

Analysis:
1. The appellant filed a stay application against the Commissioner of Service tax's order confirming a service tax demand of ?60,85,944 under construction service category with interest and penalty. The appellant, engaged in commercial and residential construction services, transitioned to paying service tax under works contract composition scheme from 01.06.2007 for contracts entered earlier. The Revenue contended the appellant should continue paying under commercial/industrial or residential complex category, issuing a show-cause notice for differential tax, interest, and penalty, confirmed in the impugned order of 28.2.2011.

2. The appellant argued the department's classification post-01.06.2007 was legally untenable, citing the Supreme Court's decision in CCE & Kerala vs Larsen Toubro Ltd, emphasizing tax liability under works contract post-01.06.2007. The Revenue relied on Nagarjuna Construction Co. Ltd Vs UOI decision, upheld by the Supreme Court, stating pre-01.06.2007 composite construction contracts paid tax on 33% value under Notification No. 1/2006 ST, precluding a change in classification. The appellant contended Larsen & Toubro Ltd decision post-dated and clarified the law on works contracts, making it applicable.

3. After considering arguments and legal precedents, the Tribunal found the appellant had a prima facie case for total waiver of pre-deposit. Citing the Larsen & Tubro Ltd decision as clarifying the position on works contracts, the Tribunal granted total waiver in favor of the appellant and stayed recovery pending appeal disposal on merits.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates