Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2016 (8) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (8) TMI 171 - HC - Companies Law


Issues Involved:
1. Payment to creditors and shareholders.
2. Verification of claims by the Official Liquidator.
3. Preferential treatment of provident fund dues.
4. Inclusion of the Income Tax Department as a respondent.
5. Distribution of residual funds to shareholders.

Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

1. Payment to creditors and shareholders:
The applicant, an Ex-Director of M/s. Real Laminates Private Limited (in liquidation), sought directions for the Official Liquidator to file a report on the amount lying with him and to make payments to shareholders after compliance with the prescribed rules. The company was wound up by an order dated 9.1.2001, and the Official Liquidator sold the company's immovable property for ?2.45 crores. The Official Liquidator reported the amounts payable to various creditors, including ?39,43,101 to the Central Excise Department and ?4,55,083 to the Commercial Tax Department as preferential creditors, and amounts to unsecured creditors.

2. Verification of claims by the Official Liquidator:
The Official Liquidator followed the procedure for disposing of the company's immovable property and invited claims through advertisements. Six authorities/persons lodged claims, which were verified by a Chartered Accountant. The verification report found no amount payable to the Bank of India and Gujarat State Financial Corporation, but specified amounts payable to other creditors. The Official Liquidator submitted reports detailing the dues and available funds, confirming that adequate funds were available to discharge liabilities.

3. Preferential treatment of provident fund dues:
The Official Liquidator highlighted the judgment of the Apex Court in Civil Appeal no.9630 of 2011, which mandated that provident fund dues should be given preference. The Provident Fund department confirmed an aggregate amount of ?7,930 as payable under Section 14B of the EPF & MP Act, 1952, and ?4,702 as provident fund dues.

4. Inclusion of the Income Tax Department as a respondent:
The Court directed the inclusion of the Income Tax Department as a respondent to ascertain any claimable dues. Despite communication from the Official Liquidator, the Income Tax Department did not submit its claim. The Court ordered the publication of a notice in two newspapers and directed the Official Liquidator to proceed with disbursement after the notice period.

5. Distribution of residual funds to shareholders:
The Official Liquidator was permitted to make payments to thirteen contributories/shareholders amounting to ?23,17,000 as per the verification report. The Court also allowed payment of ?3,38,240 to an advertising agency for advertisement charges. However, the payment of ?30,756 towards excise duty and government dues was kept open for further hearing. The Official Liquidator was directed to file a report on the distribution of the residual amount and any other claims.

Conclusion:
The application was disposed of with directions for the Official Liquidator to file an appropriate report within eight weeks, based on the Chartered Accountant's report, for making payments to shareholders after compliance with the prescribed rules.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates