Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2016 (10) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (10) TMI 669 - HC - Customs


Issues:
- Seizure and confiscation of export consignment
- Detention of containers by Directorate of Revenue Intelligence/Customs Department
- Request for release of containers
- Payment of rent for containers

Seizure and Confiscation of Export Consignment:
The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence conducted a search and seized an export consignment of muriate of potash (MOP) in violation of Customs Law. An Order in Original dated 29.2.2012 was passed confiscating the seized quantity and imposing penalties on the exporter and another individual. The order of absolute confiscation became final, leading to the detention of containers at container freight stations.

Detention of Containers by Directorate of Revenue Intelligence/Customs Department:
The petitioner, as the owner of the containers, filed writ petitions seeking the release of containers detained by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence/Customs Department at container freight stations. Although the goods were confiscated, the containers were not. The judgment emphasized the need for immediate destuffing of containers and their release, considering the finalized order of confiscation issued in 2012.

Request for Release of Containers:
The High Court disposed of the writ petitions with a direction to the Competent Authority of the Customs Department/Directorate of Revenue Intelligence to consider the petitioner's request for de-stuffing the cargo and releasing the containers within twelve weeks from the date of the order. The judgment highlighted the responsibility of the authorities to take necessary steps for the release of containers following the confiscation of goods.

Payment of Rent for Containers:
The counsel for the container freight stations informed the court that the containers had been lying at their premises for an extended period without rent payment. The judgment directed the Customs Department/Directorate of Revenue Intelligence to assist the container freight stations in recovering the rent due, suggesting that the importers found guilty could be made liable for the rental dues. The container freight stations were instructed to submit a claim for rental dues to the Customs Department for further action.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates