Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2016 (11) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (11) TMI 221 - AT - Customs


Issues involved: Classification of imported goods under heading 29339900, contention of correct classification under heading 29332950, reliance on Harmonised Commodity Data Base of World Customs Organization (WCO) for classification, failure to produce WCO database by Revenue, classification based on presence of imidazole ring in compounds, appeal against confiscation and penalty.

Classification under heading 29339900: The case involved the classification of imported 'Fenbendazole' by M/s. Shubham Pharmachem Pvt. Ltd. The Revenue contended that the item should be classified under heading 29339900, requiring a license as per foreign trade policy. The goods were held to be classified under this heading, leading to confiscation and imposition of penalty. However, the appellant argued for classification under heading 29332950 based on the presence of an imidazole ring in the compound.

Contending correct classification under heading 29332950: The appellant's counsel argued that the goods should be classified under heading 29332950 as compounds containing an imidazole ring fall under headings 293321 to 293329. He pointed out that compounds like tinidazole, mebendazole, dimetridazole, and albendazole are classified under heading 293329, emphasizing the presence of the imidazole ring as the basis for classification. The appellant presented molecule structures to support the argument that 'Fenbendazole' should be classified under heading 29332950.

Reliance on WCO database for classification: The appellant's counsel challenged the Revenue's reliance on the Harmonised Commodity Data Base of the World Customs Organization (WCO) for classification. He argued that the database was not produced or properly considered, questioning its relevance to the classification at hand. The Tribunal noted that the impugned order was solely based on this database, which the Revenue failed to produce, rendering it irrelevant for classification purposes.

Decision and analysis: After reviewing the submissions, the Tribunal upheld the appellant's classification under heading 29332950. It was emphasized that any chemical containing an imidazole ring is classifiable under headings 29332100 to 29332990. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's argument based on the structure of the compounds, leading to the allowance of the appeal against confiscation and penalty. The judgment was pronounced on 24/08/2016 by the Tribunal comprising Mr. Ramesh Nair, Member (Judicial) and Mr. Raju, Member (Technical).

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates