Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2016 (11) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (11) TMI 442 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Addition of ?1,00,518/- under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Consideration of shares purchased and held in Demat account as investment.

Analysis:
Issue 1:
The case involved an appeal against the assessment order dated 19-10-2011, where the Assessing Officer (AO) added ?1,00,518/- to the assessee's income under section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The AO based the addition on the belief that the assessee had taken bogus accommodation entries in the purchase and sale of shares, specifically of Mastek Limited, Wipro Limited, Buniyad Chemicals, and Talent Infoways Ltd. The AO contended that these transactions were not genuine and were conducted through Mahasagar Securities Private Limited, involving bogus bills and accommodation entries. The Director of Mahasagar Securities admitted to these activities. The AO rejected the assessee's claim that the shares of Buniyad Chemicals and Talent Infoways were held as investments, adding the amount reflected in the bills issued by Mahasagar Securities as unexplained cash credit. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) upheld this addition.

Issue 2:
The contention of the assessee was that the ?1,00,518/- invested in shares of Buniyad Chemicals and Talent Infoways Ltd. was sourced from the speculation gain of ?1,00,044/- earned from the sale and purchase of shares of Mastek Limited and Wipro Limited. The assessee had offered the speculation gain for taxation. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) dismissed this claim, stating that the source of investment was not explained, and no evidence was provided to support the connection between the speculation gain and the investment in Buniyad Chemicals and Talent Infoways. The Tribunal set aside the decision, emphasizing the need for verification by the AO regarding the source of investment. The Tribunal highlighted the importance of avoiding double additions of the same income and ordered the deletion of the ?1,00,518/- addition if the assessee's claim was found to be correct.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for verification of the source of investment and the connection between the speculation gain and the investment in shares of Buniyad Chemicals and Talent Infoways Ltd.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates