Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + AT Customs - 2016 (12) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2016 (12) TMI 703 - AT - Customs


Issues:
1. Benefit of Notification No.21/2002-Cus. dt. 1.3.2002 for goods used in a Nuclear Power Project.
2. Interpretation of conditions under the notification for exemption eligibility.
3. Certification requirements for goods and project capacity under the notification.
4. Dispute over denial of benefit under the notification by the authorities.
5. Grant of benefit under the project import scheme.

Issue 1: Benefit of Notification No.21/2002-Cus. dt. 1.3.2002 for goods used in a Nuclear Power Project

The appellant contended that despite being a contractor for the nuclear project, the goods imported for the project were utilized by them, justifying their eligibility for the notification's benefits. The Revenue, however, supported the decisions of the lower authorities denying the benefit.

Issue 2: Interpretation of conditions under the notification for exemption eligibility

The show cause notice alleged non-compliance with Condition No.87 of the notification, specifying that the exemption applied only if goods of Chapter Heading 98.01 were imported by specific entities. The appellant argued that the use of goods by any contractor for the project should not negate the benefit, as the notification focused on the goods' nature and purpose rather than the importer.

Issue 3: Certification requirements for goods and project capacity under the notification

The notification required the imported goods to be for setting up a nuclear project with a capacity of 440 MW or more, certified by a designated officer. The appellant demonstrated that the goods were imported for the project, as evidenced by import documents and certification, fulfilling the notification's conditions.

Issue 4: Dispute over denial of benefit under the notification by the authorities

The Tribunal emphasized that the essence of the notification was the exemption of goods used for the nuclear project, not dependent on the importer. As the goods were imported for the project and their use certified by the relevant authority, the appellant was deemed eligible for the notification's benefits, leading to the allowance of the appeal.

Issue 5: Grant of benefit under the project import scheme

Following the decision on the first appeal, the Tribunal extended the benefit of the notification to another appeal concerning goods intended for the nuclear project, affirming the entitlement of the appellant to the benefits under the notification and the project import scheme.

In conclusion, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing both appeals based on the proper interpretation of the notification's conditions and the certification of goods imported for the nuclear project. The judgment underscored that the focus was on the nature and use of the goods rather than the importer, ensuring the appellant's eligibility for the exemption benefits.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates