Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + HC Companies Law - 2017 (1) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (1) TMI 960 - HC - Companies Law


Issues:
Petition under Sections 391, 392, and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 for sanction to the proposed scheme of Arrangement between the Petitioner/Transferor Company and Non-Petitioner/Transferee Company.

Analysis:
1. Jurisdiction and Background: The Petitioner/Transferor Company filed a petition seeking sanction for a proposed scheme of arrangement with the Non-Petitioner/Transferee Company. The Transferor Company's registered office is in New Delhi, while the Transferee Company's office is in Maharashtra, under the jurisdiction of the Bombay High Court. The history and details of incorporation for both companies were provided.

2. Financial Details and Compliance: The authorized and issued share capital of the Transferor Company were outlined. It was confirmed that no proceedings were pending against the Transferor Company under relevant sections of the Act. The Memorandum and Articles of Association, along with financial statements, were submitted.

3. Proposed Scheme and Share Exchange Ratio: The proposed scheme aimed to create a larger company with increased resources and capital. The share exchange ratio was detailed, indicating the issuance of equity shares by the Transferee Company to the shareholders of the Transferor Company.

4. Board Approval and Previous Proceedings: Resolutions approving the scheme were passed by the Board of Directors of both companies. Previous applications seeking directions were mentioned, along with the dispensation of the requirement for shareholder and creditor meetings.

5. Official Liquidator and Regional Director Reports: Reports from the Official Liquidator and Regional Director were submitted, indicating no objections to the proposed scheme. Observations by the Regional Director were addressed, and compliance with RBI regulations was assured.

6. Sanction and Compliance: Considering shareholder and creditor approval, along with favorable reports, the court granted sanction to the proposed scheme. Compliance with statutory requirements was mandated, and the Transferor Company was directed to dissolve post-sanction.

7. Additional Directions and Costs: The order specified the filing of a certified copy with the Registrar of Companies, addressed deficiencies or violations, and clarified that the order did not exempt from legal obligations. A cost of &8377; 50,000 was imposed on the Transferor Company for deposit with the Delhi High Court Bar Association Fund.

8. Conclusion: The petition was allowed, and the court disposed of the matter, emphasizing compliance with all legal requirements and regulations.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates