Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2017 (2) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (2) TMI 252 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
- Eligibility for deemed credit under Notification No. 6/2002-CE(NT)
- Interpretation of Para 4 of the Notification
- Applicability of the Tribunal decision in a similar case

Eligibility for Deemed Credit:
The appellant, M/s Blue Blend Ltd, appealed against the Order in Original confirming the demand and recovery of deemed credit along with penalties. The appellant argued that they were eligible for deemed credit at a lesser rate and should have received a refund instead of facing recovery. The Ld Advocate highlighted that the appellant's factory was not a composite mill, making them eligible for deemed credit at a prescribed rate for non-composite mills. However, the Revenue authorities upheld the demand for deemed credit.

Interpretation of Para 4 of the Notification:
The issue revolved around the interpretation of Para 4 of Notification No. 6/2002-CE(NT) regarding the eligibility for deemed credit. The Ld AR for the Revenue contended that the facility of deemed credit was not available to the appellant as they were availing Cenvat Credit under Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules 2002. The Tribunal carefully considered the provisions of Para 4, which clearly stated that the Notification did not apply to a manufacturer (other than a composite mill) availing credit under Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules 2002. Consequently, the Tribunal found no merit in the appellant's appeal.

Applicability of Tribunal Decision:
The appellant relied on a Tribunal decision in a similar case, CCE, Ahmedabad vs Blue Blends India Ltd - 2003(159)ELT.36 (Tri. Del.), to support their argument. However, the Tribunal deemed this case law irrelevant to the present matter. Despite this, during the hearing, the Ld Advocate highlighted that the appellant was not given the option of paying a 25% penalty as provided by the Central Excise Act, 1944. Hence, the Tribunal granted the appellant the option of paying the penalty within 30 days of the order.

In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the impugned order regarding the demand and recovery of deemed credit but modified the penalty aspect, allowing the appellant the option of paying a reduced penalty in line with the statutory provisions. The appeal was partly allowed on these terms.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates