Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2017 (4) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (4) TMI 721 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Computation of tax due on short-term capital gains.
2. Set off of short-term capital losses against short-term capital gains.
3. Applicability of sections 70 and 71 of the Income Tax Act.
4. Distinction between short-term capital losses from different sources.
5. Inapplicability of surcharge on income-tax for a specific assessment year.

Issue 1: Computation of tax due on short-term capital gains:
The appeal involved the computation of tax due on short-term capital gains (STCG) for a specific assessment year. The Appellate Tribunal considered the provisions of section 115AD of the Income Tax Act, which divides total STCG into two portions based on the applicability of section 111A. The Tribunal emphasized that the computation of tax under section 115AD is separate from the gross total income calculation and does not involve sections 70 or 71. The Tribunal upheld the AO's decision based on the specific provisions of section 115AD and dismissed the appeal.

Issue 2: Set off of short-term capital losses against short-term capital gains:
The issue revolved around the set off of short-term capital losses (STCL) against short-term capital gains (STCG) from different sources. The assessee had incurred STCL from transactions subject to securities transaction tax (STT) and other transactions. The AO set off the STCL against STCG from both types of transactions separately. The Appellate Tribunal referred to previous decisions allowing the set off of STCL from one asset against STCG from another asset, even if taxed at different rates. Following these precedents, the Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, enabling the set off of STCL against STCG from various sources.

Issue 3: Applicability of sections 70 and 71 of the Income Tax Act:
The assessee argued for the application of sections 70 and 71 in determining the tax due on STCG under section 115AD. However, the Appellate Tribunal clarified that the computation of tax under section 115AD does not involve the provisions of sections 70 and 71. The Tribunal emphasized that the computation of tax under section 115AD is distinct and does not require the application of the set off ratios contemplated under sections 70 and 71. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the AO's decision based on the specific provisions of section 115AD.

Issue 4: Distinction between short-term capital losses from different sources:
The appeal raised concerns about the distinction made between STCL from transactions subject to STT and other STCL. The Tribunal acknowledged that while there is no inherent distinction between STCL from various sources, the set off mechanism should allow flexibility for the assessee to choose the most beneficial option. Referring to previous judgments, the Tribunal emphasized that the assessee has the right to exercise the option that is most advantageous, especially when the Act does not specify a particular set off mode. This approach favored the assessee's position in the appeal.

Issue 5: Inapplicability of surcharge on income-tax for a specific assessment year:
The assessee contended that the surcharge on income-tax was inapplicable for the relevant assessment year. However, the Tribunal did not adjudicate this specific ground raised by the appellant. The decision primarily focused on the computation of tax due on STCG and the set off of STCL against STCG from different sources.

In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal's judgment addressed various issues related to the computation of tax on short-term capital gains, the set off of short-term capital losses, and the applicability of relevant provisions under the Income Tax Act. The decision provided clarity on the treatment of STCL and STCG from different sources, emphasizing the assessee's right to choose the most beneficial set off option in the absence of specific guidelines.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates