Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2017 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (5) TMI 326 - AT - Central Excise


Issues:
Classification of pharmaceutical goods under Chapter 3003.10 or 3003.20 based on the name and appearance of the product.

Analysis:
The case involved the classification of pharmaceutical goods, specifically Oxytetracycline Hydrochloreide Capsule 500mg, under Chapter 3003.10 or 3003.20. The appellant initially classified the goods as P&P Medicament under Chapter 3003.10. The department, however, issued a show cause notice proposing classification under subheading 3003.20 based on an earlier order and the distinction between House Mark and Trade/Brand Name as per a Supreme Court decision. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand of differential duty, imposed penalties, and demanded interest. The Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the appeal, classifying the product under CSH 3003.10 due to the appearance of the Pfizer logo on the product.

In the appeal before the Tribunal, the appellant argued that the basis of the show cause notice was incorrect as the product in question was different from the one considered in the earlier order. The appellant contended that the product, "Oxytetracycline Capsules IP 500 mg," was listed in the Indian pharmacopoeia, making it classifiable under 3003.20. The appellant also referenced a previous Tribunal order that supported their classification argument. The Revenue reiterated the findings of the impugned order.

The Tribunal carefully considered the submissions and noted a previous decision involving a similar product where it was classified under 3003.20. The Tribunal analyzed the label of the product, noting that the name "Oxytetracycline Capsules I.P. 500mg" was generic and listed in the Indian pharmacopoeia. The Tribunal rejected the contention that the Pfizer logo on the product made it a P&P Medicament, emphasizing that the name of the product, not the house mark, determines classification. The Tribunal held that affixing the house mark did not change the generic nature of the product. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal.

In conclusion, the Tribunal ruled that the product, Oxytetracycline Capsules I.P. 500 mg, was a generic medicine, not a P&P medicament, and correctly classifiable under Chapter heading 3003.20. The Tribunal emphasized that the appearance of the Pfizer logo did not alter the generic classification of the product, as per the Supreme Court's decision.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates