Home Case Index All Cases Customs Customs + HC Customs - 2017 (10) TMI HC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2017 (10) TMI 989 - HC - CustomsJurisdiction - power of DRI to issue SCN - Held that - Considering that the question of law raised is yet to be decided by the Supreme Court in the appeals filed against the judgment of this Court in Mangali Impex Ltd. 2016 (5) TMI 225 - DELHI HIGH COURT , which has been stayed by the Supreme Court, the Court is not in a position to entertain the present petition and grant any of the reliefs as prayed for - petition dismissed.
Issues:
1. Adjudication of show cause notices by Directorate of Revenue Intelligence despite pending appeal. 2. Request for similar order as passed in a previous case. 3. Validity of Central Board of Excise and Customs Instruction dated 14th July 2017. 4. Court's inability to entertain petition due to pending appeal in Supreme Court. 5. Dismissal of writ petitions and pending applications. Analysis: 1. The petitioners raised concerns regarding the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence proceeding with the adjudication of show cause notices despite a previous decision by the Court in Mangali Impex Ltd. v. Union of India. The petitioners acknowledged that the said decision is under appeal in the Supreme Court and has been stayed by the Supreme Court. The Court noted the ongoing appeal and the stay order, indicating that the question of law raised is yet to be decided by the Supreme Court. Consequently, the Court stated its inability to entertain the present petition and grant the reliefs sought by the petitioners. 2. The petitioners sought a similar order to the one passed by the Court in a previous case, W.P.(C) No. 5016/2017, concerning the Master Circular issued by the Department. However, the Central Board of Excise and Customs subsequently issued an Instruction clarifying that the adjudication proceedings could continue. The petitioners did not challenge the validity of this Instruction in their petitions. The Court considered these developments and the pending appeal, leading to the dismissal of the writ petitions and pending applications. 3. The Court highlighted the significance of the pending appeal in the Supreme Court against the judgment in Mangali Impex Ltd. (supra), which has been stayed. This situation influenced the Court's decision not to entertain the present petition and provide the reliefs requested by the petitioners. The dismissal of the writ petitions and pending applications was based on the understanding that the question of law raised in the petitions is still pending before the Supreme Court, awaiting a final decision. In conclusion, the judgment addressed the issues raised by the petitioners regarding the adjudication of show cause notices, the request for a similar order to a previous case, and the validity of the CBEC Instruction. The Court's decision was guided by the pending appeal in the Supreme Court and the stay order, leading to the dismissal of the writ petitions and pending applications.
|