2009 (4) TMI 156 - SC - Income Tax

Consequence of retrospective amendment of section 28(iiia) and 28(iiic) Business profit exemption u/s 80HHC Duty Drawback and DEPB held that - By the Finance Act, 1990, Section 28 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 has been amended by inserting therein, clauses (iiia), (iiib) and (iiic) with retrospective effect with a view to ensure that cash compensatory support (CCS), duty drawback (DD) and profit on sale of import entitlement licences (IL) shall be taxable under the head Profits and Gains of Business or Profession assessee claims the deduction of duty drawback and DEPB held that - None of the above questions have been decided by the High Court. In the circumstances, we set aside the impugned order and restore Tax Appeal No.1127 of 2006 for de novo consideration by the High Court in accordance with law

Issues:
1. Interpretation of Section 28(iiia) and (iiic) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for taxation of export incentives.
2. Inclusion of profits on the sale of DEPB license and duty drawback in business profits for computing deduction under Section 80HHC.
3. Entitlement to claim benefits under Section 80HHC in case of negative profits from export of trading goods.

Analysis:
1. The Supreme Court analyzed the amendment to Section 28 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 by the Finance Act, 1990, which included clauses (iiia) and (iiic) to tax export incentives like cash compensatory support (CCS), duty drawback (DD), and profit on the sale of import entitlement licenses (IL) under the head "Profits and Gains of Business or Profession." The Court focused on the interpretation of Section 28(iiia) and (iiic) concerning profits on the sale of a license granted under the Imports (Control) Order, 1955, and duty of customs or excise re-payable as drawback against exports, respectively. It was noted that these incentives needed to be included in the business profits for computing deductions under Section 80HHC.

2. The Court specifically addressed the inclusion of profits on the sale of Duty Entitlement Pass Book (DEPB) license and duty drawback in business profits for the purpose of computing the deduction under Section 80HHC. The Assessing Officer (A.O.) contended that the profits from the DEPB license and duty drawback must fall under the specific provisions of Section 28(iiia) and (iiic) to be eligible for the deduction. The A.O. argued that since the profits were earned under different regulations than those specified in the Act, they could not be considered for the deduction. The Court highlighted the A.O.'s findings regarding the nature of the profits and duty drawback earned by the assessee and the need for compliance with the relevant rules for claiming the deduction.

3. Another crucial issue addressed by the Court was the entitlement to claim benefits under Section 80HHC when the assessee had negative profits (loss) from the export of trading goods during the assessment year. The A.O. had denied the benefit under Section 80HHC on this basis. However, the High Court had not decided on this matter. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the impugned order and remanded the case for fresh consideration by the High Court in accordance with the law. The civil appeal was allowed with no order as to costs, providing clarity on the interpretation and application of tax provisions related to export incentives and deductions under the Income-tax Act, 1961.

This detailed analysis of the judgment in the Supreme Court case provides a comprehensive understanding of the issues related to the taxation of export incentives, the inclusion of specific profits and drawbacks in business profits for deduction purposes, and the entitlement to claim benefits under Section 80HHC in case of negative profits from export activities.

← Previous Next →