Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Insolvency and Bankruptcy Insolvency and Bankruptcy + Tri Insolvency and Bankruptcy - 2017 (11) TMI Tri This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2017 (11) TMI 1578 - Tri - Insolvency and Bankruptcy


Issues involved:
1. Admittance of insolvency resolution process under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
2. Request for withdrawal of the application after admission.
3. Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional and related directions.

Issue 1: Admittance of insolvency resolution process under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016:
The petition was filed by the Operational Creditor under Section 9 of the Code due to default in payment of debt by the Corporate Debtor. The Corporate Debtor failed to appear when the matter was admitted on 05.07.2017. The Adjudicating Authority observed that the petition was filed after service of demand notice and no caveat was filed by the respondent. The Authority issued directions for the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional within 14 days from the date of admission, appointing Mr. Bhupesh Gupta for the role.

Issue 2: Request for withdrawal of the application after admission:
The Corporate Debtor, represented by Mr. Jitesh Gupta, sought an adjournment and requested time to pay the defaulting amount even by RTGS transfer. However, the Adjudicating Authority held that after admission of the petition, withdrawal cannot be permitted as per Rule 8 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016. The Authority emphasized that no scope exists for accepting the submission made on behalf of the respondent/Corporate Debtor. The order of admission detailed the service of notice to the Corporate Debtor and the lack of representation at the time of admission.

Issue 3: Appointment of Interim Resolution Professional and related directions:
The Adjudicating Authority appointed Mr. Bhupesh Gupta as the Interim Resolution Professional, specifying the term of appointment and the powers vested in the role as per Section 17 and 18 of the Code. The Interim Resolution Professional was directed to prepare an inventory of the Corporate Debtor's assets and to act in accordance with the Code, relevant rules, and professional standards. Additionally, directions were issued for the Professional to constitute the Committee of Creditors promptly, make a public announcement of the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, and file regular reports with the Tribunal regarding the Corporate Debtor's status.

This judgment by the National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh, underlines the procedural adherence and legal implications surrounding the initiation and management of the insolvency resolution process, emphasizing the role and responsibilities of the Interim Resolution Professional in overseeing the affairs of the Corporate Debtor.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates