2018 (1) TMI 1299 - AT - Income Tax

Addition u/s. 14A r.w.r. 8D - Held that - We find that while invoking the provisions of Rule 8D(2)(iii)the AO had not considered the details of the expenses, that he had not established nexus between the exempt income and the expenditure incurred for earning the said income. After considering the details of Schedule 19, we are of the opinion that the expenditure incurred by the assessee during the year was not related to earning of tax free income. Provisions of section 14A can be invoked only when some expenditure is claimed against the exempt income. As in the case under consideration the AO /FAA had not specified the items of expensed incurred for earning exempt income, so, we are able to persuade ourselves to endorse the views of the FAA - Decided in favour of assessee.

Summary

Issues:
1. Disallowance under section 14A r.w.r. 8D of the Income Tax Rules, 1962.

Analysis:
The case involved the appeal filed by the Assessee against the order of the CIT(A)-14A, Mumbai. The Assessee, a company engaged in trading and investment, declared a loss in its income tax return. The Assessing Officer completed the assessment, determining the income at a negative value. The primary issue in the appeal was the addition of a specific amount by the AO under section 14A r.w.r. 8D of the Income Tax Rules, related to dividend income claimed exempt under section 10(34) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The AO made a disallowance based on Rule 8D(2)(iii) of the rules, considering all expenses connected to exempt income. The FAA upheld the AO's order, leading to the appeal before the ITAT Mumbai.

The ITAT Mumbai, after hearing both parties, found that the AO had not adequately considered the details of expenses or established a direct link between the expenditure and the exempt income. Upon reviewing the expenses incurred by the Assessee, the ITAT concluded that the expenditure was not related to earning tax-free income. It was emphasized that section 14A can only be invoked when there is a claim against exempt income and a clear nexus between expenses and exempt income. Since this connection was not established by the AO or FAA, the ITAT decided in favor of the Assessee, allowing the appeal and reversing the previous orders.

In conclusion, the ITAT Mumbai decided the effective ground of appeal in favor of the Assessee, highlighting the importance of establishing a direct link between expenses and exempt income to justify disallowances under section 14A r.w.r. 8D. The judgment was pronounced on 3rd January 2018, overturning the disallowance made by the AO and FAA, providing relief to the Assessee in this matter.