9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2018 (2) TMI 971 - AT - Income TaxTDS u/s 195 - withholding of tax - nature of payments made to Intelsat Global Sales & Marketing Ltd., UK on account of Transponder fee in terms of an agreement dated 29/12/2010 - Held that - Relying on the judgment in the case of one of the payee, i.e. Intelsat Corporation US 2012 (9) TMI 1081 - DELHI HIGH COURT we conclude that the assessee is not obligated to deduct tax at source on payments made for transponder services. Thus, on this aspect assessee succeeds. Allowability of interest u/s 244A on refund arising due to extra deposit of TDS u/s 195 - Held that - It was a common point between the parties that the said issue was also before the Tribunal in the past, and vide order 2016 (12) TMI 1338 - ITAT MUMBAI , the same has been sent back to the file of Assessing Officer to decide in the light of the CBDT Circular No.11 of 2016 dated 26/04/2016. Following the aforesaid precedent, in this year too, we direct the Assessing Officer to follow the earlier order of the Tribunal(supra) on this aspect and decide the matter afresh and as per law. Thus, on this aspect assessee succeeds for statistical purposes.
Issues Involved:
1. Nature of the payment made by the assessee to Intelsat for transponder services. 2. Obligation of the assessee to deduct tax at source on payments made for transponder services. 3. Allowability of interest under section 244A of the Act on refund arising due to extra deposit of TDS under section 195 of the Act. Detailed Analysis: Issue 1: Nature of the Payment Made by the Assessee to Intelsat for Transponder Services The core issue in these appeals pertains to the characterization of payments made by the assessee to Intelsat Global Sales and Marketing Ltd., UK, and/or Intelsat Corporation, USA for transponder services. The Assessing Officer classified these payments as 'royalty' under the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the India-UK Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA), thereby subjecting them to tax at 10% plus applicable surcharge. The CIT(A) upheld this view. However, the assessee contended that these payments were not taxable in India, referencing a previous Tribunal decision (ITA No. 2841/Mum/2012 for AY 2011-12) which concluded that such payments were not 'royalty' and thus not taxable in India. Issue 2: Obligation to Deduct Tax at Source The Tribunal, in its prior decisions, including ITA No. 5171 to 5181/Mum/2013 dated 28/11/2016, had consistently held that payments made to Intelsat for transponder services were not in the nature of 'royalty' and thus did not warrant tax deduction at source. This conclusion was based on the judgment of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of Intelsat Corporation, USA, which held that such payments are not taxable in India under the Indo-US DTAA. Consequently, the Tribunal quashed the proceedings under section 195 of the Act, stating that the payer (assessee) was not obligated to deduct tax at source when the payee’s income was not taxable in India. Issue 3: Allowability of Interest under Section 244A The assessee also raised an additional ground regarding the allowability of interest under section 244A on refunds arising from the extra deposit of TDS under section 195. The Tribunal had previously remanded this issue back to the Assessing Officer to decide in light of CBDT Circular No. 11 of 2016 dated 26/04/2016. Following this precedent, the Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to re-examine the matter afresh and as per law. Conclusion: The Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the CIT(A)’s orders and holding that the assessee was not obligated to deduct tax at source on payments made for transponder services. This decision was based on the consistent Tribunal precedents and the Hon’ble Delhi High Court’s judgment, which clarified that such payments do not constitute 'royalty' under the DTAA and are not taxable in India. The issue of interest under section 244A was remanded to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration in accordance with the CBDT Circular. Order: All the appeals were allowed in favor of the assessee, with the Tribunal’s decision applying mutatis mutandis to all similar cases for different assessment years and for the other assessee, Disney Broadcasting (India) Limited. The order was pronounced in the open court on 09/02/2018.
|
