9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of cl. (1)(c)(iii)(B) of the second proviso to Paragraph F of the First Sch. to the Finance Act, 1965 regarding reduction of rebate from income-tax payable by the assessee based on proposed dividend amount of Rs. 24,000 versus dividend amount of Rs. 60,000 declared for profits of the earlier year. Analysis: The case involved a private limited company engaged in manufacturing plastic goods, subject to the provisions of s. 104 of the Income Tax Act. The dispute centered around the correct interpretation of the second proviso to Paragraph F of the Finance Act, 1965, specifically cl. (1)(c)(iii)(B), which mandated a reduction in rebate from tax at a rate of 7.5% on dividends other than preference shares. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) initially calculated the reduction based on a dividend of Rs. 60,000 distributed during the year under reference, related to the profits of the earlier year. The assessee contended that the reduction should be based on the proposed dividend of Rs. 24,000 only, which was to be distributed out of the current year's profits. The Appellate Authority Commission (AAC) upheld the ITO's decision, citing clarity in the Finance Act's provisions. The Tribunal, however, determined that the reduction should be calculated on the proposed dividend of Rs. 24,000, as it was declared and distributed during the current year, not on the Rs. 60,000 dividend related to the previous year's profits. The Tribunal's decision was based on the understanding that the reduction of rebate should be limited to the extent of the dividend declared or distributed, irrespective of the source of profits. The High Court agreed with the Tribunal's interpretation, emphasizing that the legislative language did not impose a condition that the dividend must be related to the profits of the current year. Drawing parallels with a previous case, the court highlighted that the reduction of rebate was justified if dividends were declared in the previous year, even if related to profits of earlier assessment years. The court stressed that in fiscal statutes, adherence to the language used is crucial, with no room for equity or intent considerations. The judgment concluded that the Tribunal's view was correct, and the reduction in rebate should be based on the proposed dividend of Rs. 24,000, not the Rs. 60,000 dividend related to the earlier year's profits. In summary, the High Court's judgment clarified that the reduction in rebate from income-tax payable by the assessee should be calculated based on the proposed dividend of Rs. 24,000 declared and distributed during the current year, in accordance with the provisions of the Finance Act, 1965. The court rejected the notion that the reduction should be tied to the profits of the current year, emphasizing the importance of interpreting fiscal statutes based on the language used, without introducing additional conditions beyond legislative intent.
|
