9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
Interpretation of sections 15C of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and section 84 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for different assessment years. Detailed Analysis: The judgment delivered by the High Court of Bombay pertained to a question referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the entitlement of the assessee to relief under section 15C of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, and section 84 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for different assessment years. The Tribunal had found in favor of the assessee, but the High Court noted that the Tribunal's decision was not in accordance with the law as declared by the High Court. The dispute revolved around the nature of the occupancy title of the premises where the new industrial undertaking was started by the assessee. The Tribunal did not delve into whether the assessee occupied the premises on a leave and license basis, as suggested by the AAC. The High Court emphasized the importance of determining the legal position of the assessee, whether as a lessee, sub-lessee, or licensee, to apply the relevant legal precedents. The legal representatives of both parties cited precedents to support their arguments. The High Court highlighted the conflicting interpretations of the term "transfer" in sections 15C and 84, as understood by the Tribunal and previous court decisions. The Court directed the Tribunal to reconsider the matter in light of the legal principles discussed in the judgment and determine the nature of the occupancy title held by the assessee. Additionally, the High Court pointed out that the Tribunal failed to consider certain aspects related to the applicability of section 84 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the Explanation to the said section for the later assessment years. The Tribunal was instructed to evaluate these aspects and provide the assessee with the entitled benefits under the relevant provisions. In conclusion, the High Court concluded that the Tribunal erred in its interpretation of the law concerning the utilization of the building by the assessee for its industrial undertaking. The Tribunal was directed to reconsider the matter in line with the legal principles discussed in the judgment. The parties were directed to bear their own costs of the reference.
|
