Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2018 (5) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (5) TMI 1236 - AT - Service Tax


Issues:
- Timeliness of show cause notice for rejection of VCES declaration

Analysis:
The case involved a dispute regarding the timeliness of the show cause notice issued to reject the VCES declaration filed by the appellant, who was engaged in providing construction of residential complex services. The appellant had not discharged the service tax liability for the period from October 2007 to December 2012 and filed a VCES declaration for tax dues amounting to ?4,75,783. The rejection of the VCES application by the adjudicating authority was based on the initiation of a specific enquiry against the appellant, which was pending. The appellant challenged this rejection before the Tribunal, arguing that the show cause notice issued on 6.9.2013 was time-barred according to Circulars issued by the CBEC. The appellant relied on previous Tribunal decisions to support the contention that the notice for rejection of VCES declaration must be issued within 30 days from the date of filing. On the other hand, the Revenue argued that the notice was issued within the stipulated time, considering the holidays falling in between.

Upon examination, the Tribunal found that the show cause notice seeking rejection of the VCES declaration was handed over to postal authorities on 9.9.2013, which was beyond the 30-day limit prescribed by the CBEC circular. The Tribunal emphasized the strict adherence to the time limit for issuing such notices and concluded that the proceedings initiated for rejection of the declaration could not be sustained solely on the ground of limitation. Citing previous decisions, the Tribunal held that failure to comply with the prescribed time limit rendered the proceedings invalid. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant.

In summary, the Tribunal's decision revolved around the timeliness of the show cause notice for rejection of the VCES declaration, emphasizing the importance of adhering to prescribed time limits in such proceedings. The appellant's argument, supported by previous Tribunal decisions, prevailed as the Tribunal found that the notice was issued beyond the stipulated period, rendering the rejection of the declaration invalid. The judgment highlighted the significance of procedural compliance and upheld the appellant's appeal based on the lack of merit in the impugned order.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates