9911796707
|
Home
Issues involved: Interpretation of payment under section 210 of the Income-tax Act and entitlement to interest under section 214 of the Act.
Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana addressed the case of a private limited company regarding advance tax payments and interest entitlement. The assessee received a notice of demand for advance tax for the assessment year 1967-68. Despite making payments, a dispute arose over the dates of payment and interest calculations. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) did not encash cheques promptly, leading to questions on the validity of payments. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on the cheque payments constituting valid payment under section 210 of the Act. However, the issue of interest entitlement under section 214 was contested. The Tribunal allowed interest on a reduced tax amount post-appeal. The High Court deliberated on these matters based on the provisions of the Act. The first question revolved around the validity of cheque payments as actual payments under section 210 of the Income-tax Act. The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, emphasizing that handing over the cheques constituted payment, and the delay in encashment was not the assessee's fault. The Court upheld the Tribunal's decision on this matter, stating that the cheques were valid forms of payment. Regarding the second question on interest entitlement under section 214 of the Act, the High Court sided with the revenue and against the assessee. The Court analyzed the provisions of section 214, highlighting that it pertains to interest on excess advance tax paid until the regular assessment date. As the assessee had not paid more advance tax than determined at regular assessment, interest on the reduced tax amount post-appeal was not applicable. The Court clarified that section 214 does not cover interest in cases of reduced tax liability due to appeal outcomes. Therefore, the assessee was not entitled to interest on the reduced tax amount as per the Act's provisions. In conclusion, the High Court's judgment addressed the issues of payment interpretation under section 210 and interest entitlement under section 214 of the Income-tax Act, providing clarity on the application of these provisions in the given case.
|
