Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2018 (7) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Cases Cited
  • Referred In
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2018 (7) TMI 537 - AT - Service Tax


Issues:
1. Whether the demand under the extended period for services received from service providers located outside India is sustainable under the Reverse Charge Mechanism?
2. Whether the demand for services related to permitting use of copyright in cinematographic films and sound recording is justified?
3. Whether the demand for Information Technology Software Service is valid considering the date of agreement and taxable entry?
4. Whether the demand for Management, Maintenance, or Repair Service is applicable before the amendment in Import of Service Rules?
5. Whether the demand for promoting a brand of goods, services, business entity, etc. through a TV program is sustainable?

Analysis:

1. The appellant contested the demand under the Reverse Charge Mechanism for services received from various international service providers. The Tribunal found that the appellant was entitled to credit of the service tax paid, indicating no intention to evade payment. Therefore, the demand under the extended period was deemed unsustainable, and the demand for Business Support Service was set aside.

2. The demand related to permitting use of copyright in cinematographic films and sound recording was upheld by the Tribunal, rejecting the appellant's argument that the content was not recorded on any medium but sent through the internet. The Tribunal did not find the appellant's submission sustainable based on a CBEC letter.

3. Regarding Information Technology Software Service, the Tribunal noted that the agreement was entered into before the taxable entry date, but the nature of activity continued beyond the taxable period. The demand for this service was upheld, as it was raised only for the period after the tax entry was introduced.

4. The demand for Management, Maintenance, or Repair Service was set aside for the period before the amendment in Import of Service Rules, as the appellant accepted its levy only after the rule change.

5. The demand for promoting a brand through a TV program was set aside by the Tribunal, agreeing with the appellant's contention that appearing in a talk show did not constitute promotion. The penalty imposed under Section 78 of the Finance Act was also set aside due to the lack of intention to evade duty under the Reverse Charge Mechanism.

In conclusion, the Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, setting aside some demands while upholding others based on the specific circumstances and legal provisions applicable to each service category.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates