9911796707
|
Home
Issues:
1. Validity of a settlement transaction of land in favor of a minor son under the E.D. Act. 2. Validity of cash gifts made by the deceased to his minor children under section 10 of the E.D. Act. 3. Characterization of properties inherited through a will as ancestral or self-acquired. Analysis: Issue 1: The judgment pertains to two references under the E.D. Act involving the validity of a settlement transaction where ac. 43-28 1/2 cents of land was gifted to a minor son by the deceased. The Appellate Tribunal held that the settlement was not void as the beneficiary was a coparcener, the minor son, and thus, the land did not form part of the deceased's estate. The decision was based on Hindu law principles requiring coparceners' consent for a valid gift. The judgment referenced a previous case to support the Tribunal's decision. Consequently, the first issue was resolved in favor of the assessee. Issue 2: Regarding the cash gifts of Rs. 80,000 made by the deceased to his minor children, the question revolved around the application of section 10 of the E.D. Act. The section deems property to pass on the donor's death unless the donee immediately assumes possession and enjoyment of it to the exclusion of the donor. The judgment analyzed the control of the guardian (father) over the gifted money and concluded that the donees had the benefit of the gift, favoring the assessee. The Tribunal's decision was upheld, and the third question was answered in favor of the assessee. Issue 3: The final issue concerned the characterization of properties inherited through a will as ancestral or self-acquired. The judgment examined a will dated March 18, 1936, and subsequent successions leading to the deceased inheriting the property. Based on the succession and enjoyment of the property, it was determined that the property in the hands of the deceased was ancestral. The Tribunal's reasoning was supported, and the second question was answered in favor of the assessee. In conclusion, all three issues raised in the references were decided in favor of the assessee, leading to a ruling against the revenue. The judgment provided detailed analysis on each issue, considering legal provisions, precedents, and factual circumstances to reach its conclusions. The assessee was awarded costs, including advocate's fees, as per the court's decision.
|
